Roush 2005-2010 Ford Mustang 4.6L 3V Heavy Duty Belt Tensioner

Compatibility and Replacement

This Mustang belt tensioner is the same belt tensioner that’s included in the 2010 Roushcharger kits, making it a replacement part for these packages:

• 2010 Mustang R2300 Roushcharger Kit (part #420026)
• 2010 Mustang R2300 Roushcharger Upgrade Kit (part #420027)
• 2010 Mustang Chrome Roushcharger (part #420024)

Heavy-Duty Design

This tensioner is specially designed for heavy duty applications to handle the added rotational forces on the FEAD from supercharging.

Upgrade Compatibility

This heavy-duty tensioner is an upgrade for all SINGLE BELT TVS R2300 ROUSH superchargers installed on 2005-2009 Mustang GTs.

Product Highlights

• Same belt tensioner included in the 2010 Roushcharger kits
• Heavy duty construction for handling extreme rotational forces on the FEAD from supercharging
• Upgrade kit for all SINGLE BELT TVS R2300 Roush superchargers for 2005-2009 Mustang GTs

Fitment

Roush Performance Warranty

For information on Roush Performance warranty terms and conditions, please click here.

Purchase Disclaimer: You are hereby informed and warned to check your local, state, and federal laws before buying and installing these or any aftermarket parts to be sure whether usage is in violation. All installation-risk and use-risk is borne by the end-user and installer of these parts. Bolt Motorsports does not condone the use of emission defeat devices for any vehicles used on public streets or roadways. Bolt Motorsports will not tamper, remove, disable, or bypass emissions equipment on a motor vehicle in accordance with 40 CFR Section 86.1854.12(a)(3), Clean Air Act 40 CFR 1068.101(b). This includes software, known as tunes, that reprogram a motor vehicles electronic control module to alter engine performance and enable the removal of filters, catalysts, and other critical emissions controls. In accordance with local laws and regulations, Bolt Motorsports will not ship parts to locations where usage or installation of said part would be in violation of the aforementioned acts.